Monday, October 19, 2015

Life and death in the African Savannah



I hear murmurs of excitement as we round a bend and standing in the road in front of us is a dazzle of Zebras, including a very young foal. We watch them grazing for a while, happy to see them content now with the heat of the afternoon having passed and recent rain providing new shoots of grass on which they feed. Quite suddenly, sharp eyed tracker Phanuel, exclaims he’s spotted a Cheetah, lying underneath some bushes just 100 meters away. We drive off into the veld and indeed; a male cheetah lies there full bellied and snoozing under a bush.


It is always so special to see a cheetah, as so few exist in the wild today. We sat captivated, observing his beautiful spots, delicate whiskers and distinct red-orange eyes that look straight through you. Surprise and joy of the cheetah aside however, the crowd pleaser of the afternoon remained the zebras, who were still grazing near the road a short way off, and in particular the young zebra foal, who after hopping around in play started nuzzling its mother and began to nurse. The collective “aww” was soon interrupted however, when we realized that the cheetah too was watching the youngster suckling. The cheetah’s body language changed in an instant and suddenly he was on his haunches, directly facing the dazzle of zebras. We sat in anguish for the following minutes that passed as, completely oblivious, the zebras grazed ever closer to the predator lying in waiting. We had previously semi-discounted the cheetah from hunting due to his full bellied, panting nature, but what a turn of events this was to be. It goes to show how opportunistic these rare animals are however, because without warning, he leapt up and shot off, scattering zebras every which way, his eyes on one individual only…the foal. Over in just seconds, the dust settled to present the cheetah and foal lying in a tangle on the ground, the cheetah’s mouth clamped firmly onto the foals neck, suffocating it to death.

What happened out next was truly heart rendering as the rest of the zebras re-grouped, recognised their missing foal, and came back in search for it, calling out their desperate, shrilly whine, loudest of all it’s mother. They soon found their quarry, lifeless at the feet of a cheetah, and apart from snorting alarms and calling out, they recognised that the situation was helpless, and left the area, heads down, whining in sadness.

Action over, the cheetah panted hard in recovery and then eventually pulled the foal by its tail, beneath a small bush to feed. As if convinced that a nearby predator or scavenger must have heard the zebra alarm calls, he nervously looked all around, in anticipation of an approaching predator coming to steal his kill. None arrived however, but we left before it got too gory, my guests heartbroken at the loss of the young animal they had grown so fond of that afternoon. Such is life and death in the African savannah. 





Lucky to survive...the rest of the zebras look on at the cheetah suffocating the foal

Checking for approaching danger






Thursday, September 3, 2015

Is that Ostrich flirting with me?



“Big-5, big-5!” requested my guests on arrival, and the Big-5 we certainly did see. But it wasn’t a member of the Big-5 that proved to be the star of their safari, but rather a bizarrely behaved female ostrich. Ostriches are not prolific in the Sabi Sands, contrast in fact, but for some time now we have been enjoying regular sightings of a female Ostrich who appears to have adventured her way to us from somewhere farther afield in Kruger National Park. 

Approaching our vehicle with great interest
Being the tallest and heaviest bird in the world, the Ostrich certainly is a marvel, but what is odd, is that this gregarious, flock-living bird is here on her own. Odder still is her behaviour, which seems to be getting stranger by the day. It started with her approaching and later chasing game drive vehicles, but more recently her behaviour seems somewhat “courtship” like.

Male ostriches perform an interesting courtship display called ‘kantling’, whereby they squat on the ground and sway from side to side whilst fanning and quivering their outstretched wings. At this signal, if the female likes what she see’s, she too squats and flaps her wings backward, while bending her neck forward and making clapping noises with her beak. I’m rather embarrassed to admit that this was extremely similar behaviour to what we witnessed. The female ostrich approached our vehicle, squatted, bent her neck forward and even made the clapping sound with her beak! This is a bit confusing, because last time I checked I’m quite sure that apart from a feather duster, our green land-rover’s don’t resemble a male ostrich in any way!

Our female ostrich displaying courtship behaviour

A researcher at heart, I did some reading on the subject, and found that indeed behaviour such as this has been observed in ostriches before, albeit in farmed ostriches in England. According to “British Poultry Science”, it was found that 70% of the female ostriches observed in a particular farm reliably “hit on” the humans when they were around! So perhaps in the absence of any males or female friends, our lonely African ostrich is just a bit confused and looking for love.

A short word on love though, and that is, she must be more careful of her choice of partner! Africa is a dangerous place for birds, especially one that shares the open savannah with the fastest land animal on earth – the cheetah. Even with her two-toe adaption for speed, she would not be able to out-run a hungry cheetah, a known major predator of the ostrich. Why then, she has chosen a few times to join us for a date with the cheetah, standing less than 20m away from the enemy fathoms believe! My only explanation is that perhaps she doesn’t recognise the risk…and luckily for her, it seems they haven’t seen her in the food light yet either.

For an ostrich who’s name is derived from the Greek “strouthos”, referring to the (false) belief that they bury their heads in sand, it seems this ostrich really does seem to buck all typical ostrich traits and seems to have exactly that- her head in the buried in the sand.


The Cheetah and the Ostrich....an unlikely pair! 


Tuesday, August 18, 2015

The sub-terrainian undertaker…A new movie, wrestler or the funeral job of a social insect?



This may seem like a strange subject to write about, but it was prompted by a question a guest asked me on game drive one day, and that was “What happens to termites when they die?” I recall pulling my “hmmm good question face”… and I thought to myself, what DOES happen to termites when they die? Do they only die outside the termatorium? Do predators outside the mound just eat all dead termites? Bearing in mind that a single colony can support hundreds upon thousands of individuals with a short life span, the death rate must be pretty high.

Colony of fungus growing termites
Completely intrigued, I did some research, and was most surprised by the results. Scientific papers dating back to 1958, entitled the likes of “The undertaking activities of social insects”, “Corpse Management of social insects”, “Differential undertaking responses of a lower termite to corpses.”…The list was endless. I read through a number of these papers and sat back in my chair by the end to mull results over. I played out a scenario in my head of a termite dying, a second individual finding it, and a third termite rushing up and stating aloud “move over, I am the undertaker”. I laughed out loud, but actually, that is exactly what happens.


To maintain healthy colonies, social insects, i.e. bees, wasps, ants and termites have evolved sophisticated ways to counter the threat of disease at both the individual and colony level.1 Any nestmates that die inside the nest represent a high risk for insect societies, especially those that have died due to some infectious agent2. All possible measures are thus taken to prevent potential sources of diseases from spreading to other members of the society, especially the queen and the brood. The nature of these insects allows for the specific division of labour in their social structures, in the sense that different individuals engage in very specialised tasks. This has lead to the development of an “undertaker worker” that exists for the purpose of engaging in corpse management and must quickly remove all the dead members of the colony inside the nests1. Bees, wasps, ants and termites are the only animals apart from humans that harbor complex behavioral strategies for disposing of dead belonging to their same species.

Termite caste system

So what does happen to social insects when they die? Honeybees, ants, and termites each show species-specific undertaking responses toward corpses (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Studies of undertaking behavior in bees have traditionally focused on the honey bee3. Honeybees dispose of nestmate corpses in a straightforward manner, i.e, corpse removal4. An “undertaker” bee typically antennae’s the dead bee briefly, grasps its appendages with mandibles, transports it outside, and drops it from the hive. Noteworthy is that other debris in honey bee colonies have been observed to be removed less rapidly3.
 
The behavioral patterns of ants are extremely diverse, but they are known to keep the interior of their nest meticulously clean. Corpse removal is common in various ant species, and is distinguished from other nest cleaning behaviors as corpses are transported more rapidly and over greater distances than inanimate objects5. Cannibalism of dead individuals was observed in some species, and the Matabele ant, for example, eat their defeated enemies after intercolony battle6, which has been considered to be adaptive as they practice cannibalism behavior more frequently during period of food shortage7. Besides cannibalism, ants are reported to perform burial behaviors using soil and nest material in response to corpses8 but it is less common probably because the energy input of burial activity is higher than corpse removal9.

The undertaker ant...removing a dead nestmate

Termites too have evolved complex systems of corpse management dealing with corpses of different ages, origins, and infection status.1 They include burial, avoidance, and cannibalism. Cannibalism of the dead in termites is considered to be a mechanism of recycling nitrogenous nutrients10, which is, in part, due to their nutritionally poor cellulosic diet11. In comparison to ants and bees, termites preference for tunnel building plays an important role in their burial behavior12. In fungus-growing species, the existence of corpses induces building behavior to separate the dead from the rest of the colony. The use of fecal material, chewed material or soil coated with saliva for building (and burial) provides antifungal components that act as further protection against fungal growth and spreadable diseases.

Termite workers and soldiers

It is one thing accepting undertaking activities, but how do these insects, some who don’t even have a brain (only a central nervous system), even know that their nestmate is dead? Research suggests that death recognition is a combination of factors, but in particular can be explained by two hypotheses: a “fatty acid death cue” and a “chemical vital sign”13. Fatty acids are released upon death for decomposition, but where corpses are found and removed within one hour (which is too short a time period to allow for decomposition), it has been suggested that the absence of a chemical associated with life may prompt undertaking activities14.

As a result, these social insects exhibit specific responses to the nature of the corpses, including their postmortem time, infection status (whether harmful fungi are present), and origin (whether or not the corpse is a nestmate or of the same species). Responses then vary from removal, burial or cannibalism. Fungus growing termites, for example, were found to isolate fungal infected individuals by burying the dead onsite, while the healthy corpses were cannibalised15. Soldiers were also involved with guarding corpses as the burial response was underway. In honeybees, 1h old corpses were observed to be removed more quickly than freshly killed individuals3, and dead ants of the species “Red wood Ant” were consumed for food, but infectious ants were avoided16. In another species, workers discriminated old corpses from freshly killed individuals, with new corpses buried while old ones are transported outside17.


So next time you see one of these social insects, or drive past their colonies, keep an eye open for this intriguing behavior, and you never know, one day you may even meet “The Undertaker”. 


Ant caste system


Reference List


  1. The funeral ways of social insects
  2. http://www.academia.edu/6390866/The_funeral_ways_of_social_insects._Social_strategies_for_corpse_disposal
  3. Corpse Management in social insects http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3619097/
  4. Visscher PK. The honey bee way of death: Necrophoric behaviour in Apis mellifera colonies. Anim Behav. 1983;31(4):1070–1076
  5. Suzuki K, Yoshihama T, Shigematsu Y. Sweeping behaviours of honey bees at the hive entrance. Bull Fac Edu, Chiba Univ. 1974;23:273–28Wilson EO, Durlach NI, Roth LM. Chemical releaser of necrophoric behavior in ants. Psyche. 1958;65(4):108–114
  6. Marikovsky P. On some features of behavior of the ants Formica rufa L. infected with fungous disease. Insect Soc. 1962;9(2):173–179
  7. Driessen GJJ, Raalte ATV, Bruyn GJD. Cannibalism in the red wood ant, Formica polyctena (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Oecol. 1984;63(1):13–22
  8. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1990.
  9. Renucci M, Tirard A, Provost E. Complex undertaking behavior in Temnothorax lichtensteini ant colonies: from corpse-burying behavior to necrophoric behavior. Insect Soc. 2010;58(1):9–16.
  10. Kramm KR, West DF, Rockenbach PG. Termite pathogens: Transfer of the entomopathogen Metarhizium anisopliae between Reticulitermes sp. termites. J Invertebr Pathol. 1982;40(1):1–6
  11. Rosengaus RB, Traniello JFA, Bulmer MS. Ecology, behavior and evolution of disease resistance in termites. In: Bignell ED, Roisin Y, Lo N, editors. Biology of termites: A modern synthesis. New York: Springer; 2011. pp. 165–191.
  12. Apparent synergy among defense mechanisms in subterranean termites (Rhinotermitidae) against epizootic events: limits and potential for biological control.Chouvenc T, Su NYJ Econ Entomol. 2010 Aug; 103(4):1327-37.
  13. Wilson EO, Durlach NI, Roth LM. Chemical releaser of necrophoric behavior in ants. Psyche. 1958;65(4):108–114.)
  14. Choe DH, Millar JG, Rust MK. Chemical signals associated with life inhibit necrophoresis in Argentine ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(20):8251–8255.
  15. Kramm KR, West DF, Rockenbach PG. Termite pathogens: Transfer of the entomopathogen Metarhizium anisopliae between Reticulitermes sp. termites. J Invertebr Pathol. 1982;40(1):1–6.
  16. Marikovsky P. On some features of behavior of the ants Formica rufa L. infected with fungous disease. Insect Soc. 1962;9(2):173–179.
  17. Renucci M, Tirard A, Provost E. Complex undertaking behavior in Temnothorax lichtensteini ant colonies: from corpse-burying behavior to necrophoric behavior. Insect Soc. 2010;58(1):9–16.